According to the CDC:
“Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) represent approximately 2% of the United States population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV. In 2010, young gay and bisexual men (aged 13-24 years) accounted for 72% of new HIV infections among all persons aged 13 to 24, and 30% of new infections among all gay and bisexual men.”
“Less than one quarter of women and heterosexual men had 2 or more sexual partners, whereas 59% of MSM [men who have sex with men] reported having multiple partners.”
HIV transmission risk behavior among men and women living with HIV in 4 cities in the United States.
Weinhardt LS et al.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004 Aug 15;36(5):1057-66.
“Sixty-eight percent of HIV transmissions were from main sex partners…”
“Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities.”
Sullivan PS et al.
AIDS. 2009 Jun 1;23(9):1153-62.
“Unprotected anal intercourse with a male partner was reported by 54% of the participants; 37% reported having unprotected anal sex with a main male partner, and 25% reported having unprotected anal sex with a casual male partner…”
“HIV risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among men who have sex with men--National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, 21 U.S. cities, United States, 2008.”
Finlayson TJ et al.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 Oct 28;60(14):1-34.
“Forty percent of HIV-positive men and 34% of HIV-negative men reported that they had UAI [unprotected anal intercourse] in the previous 3 months.”
“Risk and protective factors related to HIV-risk behavior: a comparison between HIV-positive and HIV-negative young men who have sex with men.”
Forney JC et al.
“Of the…new HIV infections, 51% were through anal sex with a condom, 33% anal sex without a condom and 16% oral sex.”
“HIV transmission among men who have sex with men due to condom failure.”
Remis RS et al.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e107540.
Author’s note: “gay” apologists will argue that HIV and sexually transmitted disease rates will plummet in the homosexual population after the legalization of same-sex marriage, i.e. that once gay men can legally marry - they will embrace monogamy and hence a drastic drop in HIV and STD infections; yet, in the Netherlands, arguably the most socially progressive country in history with regards to LGBT rights, the Netherlands became the first country in the world to legalize same-sex marriage in 2001, 45% of HIV negative “gay” men tested positive for the HPV.1.
Why is this the case? Because so-called “gay” monogamy creates a false barrier of protection between the couple and the AIDS virus: “studies report that gay men in committed relationships engage in higher rates of UAI [unprotected anal intercourse] with their primary partners than single gay men with their casual partners;” in addition, the majority of “gay” male “committed relationships” are actually negotiated open partnerships: a study conducted in the most gay-friendly American city - San Francisco, found that more than 50% of couples reported some sort of agreement that allowed for sex with an outside casual partner.2. Furthermore, condoms themselves offer only some protection - a Canadian study determined that over 50% of HIV cases were as a result of condom failure during anal intercourse.
In conclusion, when a parent, often proudly, gives their son over to “gay,” they are actually handing them over to death.
1. “Prevalence of anal lrHPV [Human Papillomavirus] was 45% in HIV-negative MSM and 69% in HIV-positive MSM.”
“Association of HIV Infection With Anal and Penile Low-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infections Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Amsterdam: The HIV & HPV in MSM Study.
Welling CA et al.
Sex Transm Dis. 2015 Jun;42(6):297-304.
2. “…45% had monogamous agreements, 47% had open agreements, and 8% reported discrepant agreements.”
“Relationship Characteristics and Motivations behind Agreements among Gay Male Couples: Differences by Agreement Type and Couple Serostatus.”
Colleen C. Hoff, PhD, et al.
AIDS Care. 2010 Jul; 22(7): 827–835.